| Title |
Multiple driving factors explain spatial and temporal variability in coral calcification rates on the Bermuda platform
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Coral Reefs, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00338-014-1191-9 |
| Authors |
A. Venti, A. Andersson, C. Langdon |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 138 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 27% |
| Researcher | 29 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 34 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 30 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2014.
All research outputs
#5,637,424
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Coral Reefs
#685
of 1,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,453
of 228,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Coral Reefs
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.