↓ Skip to main content

Cassava mosaic geminiviruses in Africa

Overview of attention for chapter
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
196 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
Chapter title
Cassava mosaic geminiviruses in Africa
Published in
Plant Molecular Biology, November 2004
DOI 10.1007/s11103-004-1651-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

J.P. Legg, C.M. Fauquet

Abstract

Cassava mosaic disease (CMD) caused by cassava mosaic geminiviruses (CMGs) (Geminiviridae:Begomovirus) is undoubtedly the most important constraint to the production of cassava in Africa at the outset of the 21st century. Although the disease was recorded for the first time in the latter part of the 19th century, for much of the intervening period it has been relatively benign in most of the areas where it occurs and has generally been considered to be of minor economic significance. Towards the end of the 20th century, however, the inherent dynamism of the causal viruses was demonstrated, as a recombinant hybrid of the two principal species was identified, initially from Uganda, and shown to be associated with an unusually severe and rapidly spreading epidemic of CMD. Subsequent spread throughout East and Central Africa, the consequent devastation of production of the cassava crop, a key staple in much of this region, and the observation of similar recombination events elsewhere, has once again demonstrated the inherent danger posed to man by the capacity of these viruses to adapt to their environment and optimally exploit their relationships with the whitefly vector, plant host and human cultivator. In this review of cassava mosaic geminiviruses in Africa, we examine each of these relationships, and highlight the ways in which the CMGs have exploited them to their own advantage.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 4 2%
Colombia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 228 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 18%
Researcher 42 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 17%
Student > Postgraduate 17 7%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Other 43 18%
Unknown 41 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 153 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 7%
Engineering 6 2%
Environmental Science 6 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 2%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 44 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,269,121
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Plant Molecular Biology
#131
of 2,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,792
of 62,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Molecular Biology
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,846 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.