↓ Skip to main content

Coinfection with Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Trichomonas vaginalis: a cross-sectional analysis of positivity and risk factors in remote Australian Aboriginal communities

Overview of attention for article published in Sexually Transmitted Infections, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coinfection with Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Trichomonas vaginalis: a cross-sectional analysis of positivity and risk factors in remote Australian Aboriginal communities
Published in
Sexually Transmitted Infections, October 2014
DOI 10.1136/sextrans-2014-051535
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca Guy, James Ward, Handan Wand, Alice Rumbold, Linda Garton, Belinda Hengel, Bronwyn Silver, Debbie Taylor-Thomson, Janet Knox, Skye McGregor, Amalie Dyda, Christopher Fairley, Lisa Maher, Basil Donovan, John Kaldor, Donna Ah Chee, John Boffa, David Glance, Mathew Law, Robyn McDermott, Steven Skov

Abstract

To determine the co-occurrence and epidemiological relationships of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) in a high-prevalence setting in Australia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Researcher 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 20 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 21 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2015.
All research outputs
#8,499,896
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Sexually Transmitted Infections
#2,018
of 3,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,665
of 277,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sexually Transmitted Infections
#26
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.