↓ Skip to main content

Infrared Coagulator Ablation of High‐Grade Anal Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions in HIV‐Negative Males Who Have Sex with Males

Overview of attention for article published in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Infrared Coagulator Ablation of High‐Grade Anal Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions in HIV‐Negative Males Who Have Sex with Males
Published in
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, May 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10350-006-0874-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen E. Goldstone, Joshua S. Hundert, Jeff W. Huyett

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 39 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 8 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 17%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Master 5 12%
Other 4 10%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 67%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Unspecified 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
#2,064
of 4,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,539
of 86,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.