| Title |
Use of mobile tablet devices and reduction in time to perioperative transesophageal echocardiography reporting: a historical cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12630-014-0250-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brandi Bottiger, Sharon McCartney, Igor Akushevich, Alina Nicoara, Mamata Yanamadala, Madhav Swaminathan |
| Abstract |
Timely communication of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) findings to the postoperative care team is critical to optimizing patient care. We compared the use of a personal computer (PC) system with the use of a mobile tablet device (MTD) system for point-of-care TEE data entry and hypothesized that the MTD-based system would reduce the time to preliminary TEE reporting and decrease the incidence of delinquent reporting by 50%. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 50% |
| Canada | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 21% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 71% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1,390
of 2,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,807
of 274,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#23
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.