| Title |
Evolution of nutritional status in patients with autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-014-2473-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Romina L. Barritta de Defranchi, Andrea Bordalejo, Inés Cañueto, Angeles Villar, Elizabet Navarro |
| Abstract |
To describe the nutritional status in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in three different defined moments: at admission to the Bone Marrow Transplant Unit (BMTU), at discharge from the BMTU and at follow-up. We hypothesized that nutrition status declines during hospitalization and recovers at follow-up. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2015.
All research outputs
#14,788,263
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#2,931
of 4,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,852
of 260,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#52
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.