| Title |
Strategic crossing of biomass and harvest index—source and sink—achieves genetic gains in wheat
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Euphytica, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10681-017-2040-z |
| Authors |
Matthew P. Reynolds, Alistair J. D. Pask, William J. E. Hoppitt, Kai Sonder, Sivakumar Sukumaran, Gemma Molero, Carolina Saint Pierre, Thomas Payne, Ravi P. Singh, Hans J. Braun, Fernanda G. Gonzalez, Ignacio I. Terrile, Naresh C. D. Barma, Abdul Hakim, Zhonghu He, Zheru Fan, Dario Novoselovic, Maher Maghraby, Khaled I. M. Gad, ElHusseiny G. Galal, Adel Hagras, Mohamed M. Mohamed, Abdul Fatah A. Morad, Uttam Kumar, Gyanendra P. Singh, Rudra Naik, Ishwar K. Kalappanavar, Suma Biradar, Sakuru V. Sai Prasad, Ravish Chatrath, Indu Sharma, Kishor Panchabhai, Virinder S. Sohu, Gurvinder S. Mavi, Vinod K. Mishra, Arun Balasubramaniam, Mohammad R. Jalal-Kamali, Manoochehr Khodarahmi, Manoochehr Dastfal, Seyed M. Tabib-Ghaffari, Jabbar Jafarby, Ahmad R. Nikzad, Hossein Akbari Moghaddam, Hassan Ghojogh, Asghar Mehraban, Ernesto Solís-Moya, Miguel A. Camacho-Casas, Pedro Figueroa-López, Javier Ireta-Moreno, Jorge I. Alvarado-Padilla, Alberto Borbón-Gracia, Araceli Torres, Yei Nayeli Quiche, Shesh R. Upadhyay, Deepak Pandey, Muhammad Imtiaz, Monsif U. Rehman, Manzoor Hussain, Makhdoom Hussain, Riaz Ud-Din, Maqsood Qamar, Muhammad Sohail, Muhammad Y. Mujahid, Gulzar Ahmad, Abdul J. Khan, Mahboob A. Sial, Pompiliu Mustatea, Eben von Well, Moses Ncala, Stephan de Groot, Abdelraheem H. A. Hussein, Izzat S. A. Tahir, Amani A. M. Idris, Hala M. M. Elamein, Yann Manes, Arun K. Joshi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 135 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 71 | 53% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 48 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,730,986
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Euphytica
#127
of 1,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,136
of 328,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Euphytica
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,138 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them