↓ Skip to main content

Identify a shared neural circuit linking multiple neuropsychiatric symptoms with Alzheimer’s pathology

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Imaging and Behavior, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Identify a shared neural circuit linking multiple neuropsychiatric symptoms with Alzheimer’s pathology
Published in
Brain Imaging and Behavior, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11682-017-9767-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xixi Wang, Ping Ren, Mark Mapstone, Yeates Conwell, Anton P. Porsteinsson, John J. Foxe, Rajeev D. S. Raizada, Feng Lin, and the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract

Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are common in Alzheimer's disease (AD)-associated neurodegeneration. However, NPS lack a consistent relationship with AD pathology. It is unknown whether any common neural circuits can link these clinically disparate while mechanistically similar features with AD pathology. Here, we explored the neural circuits of NPS in AD-associated neurodegeneration using multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) of resting-state functional MRI data. Data from 98 subjects (70 amnestic mild cognitive impairment and 28 AD subjects) were obtained. The top 10 regions differentiating symptom presence across NPS were identified, which were mostly the fronto-limbic regions (medial prefrontal cortex, caudate, etc.). These 10 regions' functional connectivity classified symptomatic subjects across individual NPS at 69.46-81.27%, and predicted multiple NPS (indexed by Neuropsychiatric Symptom Questionnaire-Inventory) and AD pathology (indexed by baseline and change of beta-amyloid/pTau ratio) all above 70%. Our findings suggest a fronto-limbic dominated neural circuit that links multiple NPS and AD pathology. With further examination of the structural and pathological changes within the circuit, the circuit may shed light on linking behavioral disturbances with AD-associated neurodegeneration.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Master 6 10%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 25 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Neuroscience 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 29 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2017.
All research outputs
#20,451,228
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#1,008
of 1,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,217
of 316,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#17
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.