↓ Skip to main content

Empowerment and Indigenous Australian health: a synthesis of findings from Family Wellbeing formative research

Overview of attention for article published in Health & Social Care in the Community, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Empowerment and Indigenous Australian health: a synthesis of findings from Family Wellbeing formative research
Published in
Health & Social Care in the Community, October 2009
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2009.00885.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Komla Tsey, Mary Whiteside, Melissa Haswell‐Elkins, Roxanne Bainbridge, Yvonne Cadet‐James, Andrew Wilson

Abstract

This paper employs a thematic qualitative analysis to synthesise seven discrete formative evaluation reports of an Indigenous Australian family empowerment programme across four study settings in Australia's Northern Territory and Queensland between 1998 and 2005. The aim of the study, which involved a total of 148 adult and 70 school children participants, is to develop a deeper understanding of the contribution of community empowerment education programmes to improving Indigenous health, beyond the evidence derived from the original discrete micro evaluative studies. Within a context beset by trans-generational grief and despair resulting from colonisation and other discriminatory government policies, across the study sites, the participants demonstrated enhanced capacity to exert greater control over factors shaping their health and wellbeing. Evident in the participants' narratives was a heightened sense of Indigenous and spiritual identity, respect for self and others, enhanced parenting and capacity to deal with substance abuse and violence. Changes at the personal level influenced other individuals and systems over time, highlighting the ecological or multilevel dimensions of empowerment. The study reveals the role of psychosocial empowerment attributes as important foundational resources in helping people engage and benefit from health and other behaviour modification programmes, and take advantage of any reforms made within macro policy environments. A key limitation or challenge in the use of psychosocial empowerment programmes relates to the time and resources required to achieve change at population level. A long-term partnership approach to empowerment research that creatively integrates micro community empowerment initiatives with macro policies and programmes is vital if health gains are to be maximised.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 206 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 20%
Student > Bachelor 30 14%
Researcher 23 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 38 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 38 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 17%
Psychology 34 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 11%
Arts and Humanities 11 5%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 40 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,415,902
of 25,832,559 outputs
Outputs from Health & Social Care in the Community
#485
of 2,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,150
of 108,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health & Social Care in the Community
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,832,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.