↓ Skip to main content

Antimicrobial action from a novel porphyrin derivative in photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy in vitro

Overview of attention for article published in Lasers in Medical Science, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Antimicrobial action from a novel porphyrin derivative in photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy in vitro
Published in
Lasers in Medical Science, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10103-014-1681-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miftahul Akhyar Latief, Taiichiro Chikama, Momoko Shibasaki, Takaaki Sasaki, Ji-Ae Ko, Yoshiaki Kiuchi, Takemasa Sakaguchi, Akira Obana

Abstract

Efforts to identify improved treatments for corneal infection include the development of photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT). We evaluated the antimicrobial effect of PACT with a novel porphyrin derivative, TONS 504, and a novel light system on methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Bacteria were irradiated with a light-emitting diode (LED) at energies of 10, 20, or 30 J/cm(2) in the presence of various concentrations of TONS 504. Bacterial viability was assessed at 30 min and 24 h after irradiation by determination of colony formation on agar plates. PACT inhibited the growth of both MSSA and MRSA as early as 30 min after light exposure. Complete inhibition of bacterial growth was apparent at 24 h after irradiation at a TONS 504 concentration of 1 mg/L and LED energies of ≥10 J/cm(2) or a TONS 504 concentration of 0.5 mg/L and LED energies of ≥20 J/cm(2) for MSSA, and at a TONS 504 concentration of 10 mg/L and LED energies of ≥10 J/cm(2) or of a TONS 504 concentration of 1 mg/L and LED energies of ≥20 J/cm(2) for MRSA. Bacterial growth was unaffected by TONS 504 in the absence of irradiation or by irradiation in the absence of TONS 504. Our results thus demonstrate the antimicrobial efficacy of PACT with TONS 504 and a LED against both MSSA and MRSA in vitro, and they therefore provide a basis for further investigation of this system as a potential treatment for corneal infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 56 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 19%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Lecturer 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 16 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2014.
All research outputs
#18,381,794
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Lasers in Medical Science
#869
of 1,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,399
of 260,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lasers in Medical Science
#27
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,307 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.