You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
TumorMap: Exploring the Molecular Similarities of Cancer Samples in an Interactive Portal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Research, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-0580 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yulia Newton, Adam M Novak, Teresa Swatloski, Duncan C McColl, Sahil Chopra, Kiley Graim, Alana S Weinstein, Robert Baertsch, Sofie R Salama, Kyle Ellrott, Manu Chopra, Theodore C Goldstein, David Haussler, Olena Morozova, Joshua M Stuart |
| Abstract |
Vast amounts of molecular data are being collected on tumor samples, which provide unique opportunities for discovering trends within and between cancer subtypes. Such cross-cancer analyses require computational methods that enable intuitive and interactive browsing of thousands of samples based on their molecular similarity. We created a portal called TumorMap to assist in exploration and statistical interrogation of high-dimensional complex "omics" data in an interactive and easily interpretable way. In the TumorMap, samples are arranged on a hexagonal grid based on their similarity to one another in the original genomic space and are rendered with Google's Map technology. While the important feature of this public portal is the ability for the users to build maps from their own data, we pre-built genomic maps from several previously published projects. We demonstrate the utility of this portal by presenting results obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas project data. Cancer Res; 77(21); e111-4. ©2017 AACR. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 50% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Qatar | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 52% |
| Scientists | 18 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 22% |
| Researcher | 19 | 19% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 29 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 11% |
| Engineering | 6 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 25 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,659,288
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Research
#1,093
of 18,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,792
of 341,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Research
#35
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.