↓ Skip to main content

Specific cleavage of simian virus 40 DNA by restriction endonuclease of Hemophilus influenzae *

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
patent
4 patents
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
340 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
295 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Specific cleavage of simian virus 40 DNA by restriction endonuclease of Hemophilus influenzae *
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2011
DOI 10.1073/pnas.68.12.2913
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathleen Danna, Daniel Nathans

Abstract

A bacterial restriction endonuclease has been used to produce specific fragments of SV40 DNA. Digestion of DNA from plaque-purified stocks of SV40 with the restriction endonuclease from Hemophilus influenzae gave 11 fragments resolvable by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, eight of which were equimolar with the original DNA. The fragments ranged from about 6.5 x 10(5) to 7.4 x 10(4) daltons, as determined by electron microscopy, DNA content, or electrophoretic mobility.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Germany 3 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 283 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 21%
Student > Bachelor 61 21%
Student > Master 40 14%
Researcher 34 12%
Other 14 5%
Other 28 9%
Unknown 57 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 87 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 5%
Chemistry 12 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 2%
Other 24 8%
Unknown 62 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,161,987
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#17,161
of 101,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,304
of 113,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#88
of 703 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 703 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.