↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Variation in the Adoption of Transradial Access for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Insights From the NCDR CathPCI Registry

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
21 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Variation in the Adoption of Transradial Access for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Insights From the NCDR CathPCI Registry
Published in
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Javier A. Valle, Lisa A. Kaltenbach, Steven M. Bradley, Robert W. Yeh, Sunil V. Rao, Hitinder S. Gurm, Ehrin J. Armstrong, John C. Messenger, Stephen W. Waldo

Abstract

The study sought to define patient, operator, and institutional factors associated with transradial access (TRA) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the variation in use across operators and institutions, and the relationship with mortality and bleeding. TRA for PCI in STEMI is underutilized. Factors associated with TRA are not well described, nor is there variation across operators and institutions or their relationship with outcomes. The authors used hierarchical logistic regression to identify patient, operator, and institutional characteristics associated with TRA use as well as determine the variation in TRA for STEMI PCI from 2009 to 2015. They also described the relationship between operator- and institution-level use and risk-adjusted bleeding and mortality. Among 692,433 patients undergoing STEMI PCI, 12% (n = 82,618) utilized TRA. TRA increased from 2% to 23% from 2009 to 2015, but with significant geographic variation. Age, sex, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, operators entering practice before 2012, and nonacademically affiliated institutions were associated with lower rates of TRA. There was significant operator and institutional variation, wherein identical patients would have >8-fold difference in odds of TRA for STEMI PCI by changing operators (median odds ratio: 8.7), and >5-fold difference by changing institutions (median odds ratio: 5.1). Greater TRA use across operators was associated with reduced bleeding (rho = -0.053), whereas TRA use across institutions was associated with reduced mortality (rho = -0.077). Transradial access for STEMI PCI is increasing, but remains underutilized with significant geographic, operator, and institutional variation. These findings suggest an ongoing opportunity to standardize STEMI care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Other 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 18 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 41%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Unknown 23 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2020.
All research outputs
#878,475
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#285
of 4,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,586
of 340,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#7
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.