You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multisite Investigation of Outcomes With Implementation of CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.022 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Larisa H. Cavallari, Craig R. Lee, Amber L. Beitelshees, Rhonda M. Cooper-DeHoff, Julio D. Duarte, Deepak Voora, Stephen E. Kimmel, Caitrin W. McDonough, Yan Gong, Chintan V. Dave, Victoria M. Pratt, Tameka D. Alestock, R. David Anderson, Jorge Alsip, Amer K. Ardati, Brigitta C. Brott, Lawrence Brown, Supatat Chumnumwat, Michael J. Clare-Salzler, James C. Coons, Joshua C. Denny, Chrisly Dillon, Amanda R. Elsey, Issam S. Hamadeh, Shuko Harada, William B. Hillegass, Lindsay Hines, Richard B. Horenstein, Lucius A. Howell, Linda J.B. Jeng, Mark D. Kelemen, Yee Ming Lee, Oyunbileg Magvanjav, May Montasser, David R. Nelson, Edith A. Nutescu, Devon C. Nwaba, Ruth E. Pakyz, Kathleen Palmer, Josh F. Peterson, Toni I. Pollin, Alison H. Quinn, Shawn W. Robinson, Jamie Schub, Todd C. Skaar, D. Max Smith, Vindhya B. Sriramoju, Petr Starostik, Tomasz P. Stys, James M. Stevenson, Nicholas Varunok, Mark R. Vesely, Dyson T. Wake, Karen E. Weck, Kristin W. Weitzel, Russell A. Wilke, James Willig, Richard Y. Zhao, Rolf P. Kreutz, George A. Stouffer, Philip E. Empey, Nita A. Limdi, Alan R. Shuldiner, Almut G. Winterstein, Julie A. Johnson, IGNITE Network |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 211 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 12% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 35 | 17% |
| Unknown | 76 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 23% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 36 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 85 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,051,897
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#382
of 4,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,752
of 345,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
#10
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.