↓ Skip to main content

Using a Constructed-Response Instrument to Explore the Effects of Item Position and Item Features on the Assessment of Students’ Written Scientific Explanations

Overview of attention for article published in Research in Science Education, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Using a Constructed-Response Instrument to Explore the Effects of Item Position and Item Features on the Assessment of Students’ Written Scientific Explanations
Published in
Research in Science Education, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11165-014-9435-9
Authors

Meghan Rector Federer, Ross H. Nehm, John E. Opfer, Dennis Pearl

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 54 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 13 24%
Unknown 19 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 15 27%
Psychology 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 24 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2016.
All research outputs
#12,905,203
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Research in Science Education
#189
of 655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,954
of 260,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research in Science Education
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 655 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.