↓ Skip to main content

Gambling for redemption and self-fulfilling debt crises

Overview of attention for article published in Economic Theory, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 389)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Gambling for redemption and self-fulfilling debt crises
Published in
Economic Theory, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00199-017-1085-5
Authors

Juan Carlos Conesa, Timothy J. Kehoe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 54 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 36%
Student > Master 9 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Professor 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 39 71%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 11 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#5,052,436
of 23,985,711 outputs
Outputs from Economic Theory
#28
of 389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,027
of 331,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Theory
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,985,711 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 389 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.