You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
From ‘does it work?’ to ‘what makes it work?’: The importance of making assumptions explicit when designing and evaluating behavioural interventions
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1177/1474515114531688 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Benjamin Gardner, Anders Broström, Per Nilsen, Harald Hrubos Ström, Martin Ulander, Bengt Fridlund, Janna Skagerström, Peter Johansson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Sweden | 1 | 3% |
Portugal | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 32 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Professor | 3 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 31% |
Unknown | 7 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 9 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 8 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2014.
All research outputs
#14,720,444
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
#622
of 839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,181
of 229,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.