↓ Skip to main content

From ‘does it work?’ to ‘what makes it work?’: The importance of making assumptions explicit when designing and evaluating behavioural interventions

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From ‘does it work?’ to ‘what makes it work?’: The importance of making assumptions explicit when designing and evaluating behavioural interventions
Published in
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, April 2014
DOI 10.1177/1474515114531688
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin Gardner, Anders Broström, Per Nilsen, Harald Hrubos Ström, Martin Ulander, Bengt Fridlund, Janna Skagerström, Peter Johansson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Sweden 1 3%
Portugal 1 3%
Unknown 32 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 11 31%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2014.
All research outputs
#14,720,444
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
#622
of 839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,181
of 229,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.