You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genomic catastrophes frequently arise in esophageal adenocarcinoma and drive tumorigenesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms6224 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katia Nones, Nicola Waddell, Nicci Wayte, Ann-Marie Patch, Peter Bailey, Felicity Newell, Oliver Holmes, J. Lynn Fink, Michael C. J. Quinn, Yue Hang Tang, Guy Lampe, Kelly Quek, Kelly A. Loffler, Suzanne Manning, Senel Idrisoglu, David Miller, Qinying Xu, Nick Waddell, Peter J. Wilson, Timothy J. C. Bruxner, Angelika N. Christ, Ivon Harliwong, Craig Nourse, Ehsan Nourbakhsh, Matthew Anderson, Stephen Kazakoff, Conrad Leonard, Scott Wood, Peter T. Simpson, Lynne E. Reid, Lutz Krause, Damian J. Hussey, David I. Watson, Reginald V. Lord, Derek Nancarrow, Wayne A. Phillips, David Gotley, B. Mark Smithers, David C. Whiteman, Nicholas K. Hayward, Peter J. Campbell, John V. Pearson, Sean M. Grimmond, Andrew P. Barbour |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 44% |
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 205 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 23% |
| Researcher | 48 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 35 | 17% |
| Unknown | 31 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 73 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 32 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,443,924
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#21,292
of 58,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,250
of 276,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#244
of 745 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 745 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.