↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for psychosexual dysfunction in women treated for gynaecological malignancy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for psychosexual dysfunction in women treated for gynaecological malignancy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004708.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Flynn, Fiona Kew, Steve R Kisely

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 167 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Researcher 12 7%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 9 5%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 66 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 15%
Psychology 18 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 70 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,265
of 107,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.