↓ Skip to main content

Implementing for Sustainability: Promoting Use of a Measurement Feedback System for Innovation and Quality Improvement

Overview of attention for article published in Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Implementing for Sustainability: Promoting Use of a Measurement Feedback System for Innovation and Quality Improvement
Published in
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10488-014-0607-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan Douglas, Suzanne Button, Susan E. Casey

Abstract

Measurement feedback systems (MFSs) are increasingly recognized as evidence-based treatments for improving mental health outcomes, in addition to being a useful administrative tool for service planning and reporting. Promising research findings have driven practice administrators and policymakers to emphasize the incorporation of outcomes monitoring into electronic health systems. To promote MFS integrity and protect against potentially negative outcomes, it is vital that adoption and implementation be guided by scientifically rigorous yet practical principles. In this point of view, the authors discuss and provide examples of three user-centered and theory-based principles: emphasizing integration with clinical values and workflow, promoting administrative leadership with the 'golden thread' of data-informed decision-making, and facilitating sustainability by encouraging innovation. In our experience, enacting these principles serves to promote sustainable implementation of MFSs in the community while also allowing innovation to occur, which can inform improvements to guide future MFS research.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Indonesia 1 1%
Unknown 92 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Student > Master 15 15%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 20 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 30%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 26 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2014.
All research outputs
#21,186,729
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#651
of 670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,811
of 262,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#19
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.