↓ Skip to main content

Macroscopic Response to Microscopic Intrinsic Noise in Three-Dimensional Fisher Fronts

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Macroscopic Response to Microscopic Intrinsic Noise in Three-Dimensional Fisher Fronts
Published in
Physical Review Letters, October 2014
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.113.180602
Pubmed ID
Authors

S Nesic, R Cuerno, E Moro

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Researcher 4 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Professor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 13 54%
Mathematics 2 8%
Engineering 2 8%
Chemistry 1 4%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2014.
All research outputs
#4,468,500
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#11,438
of 35,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,410
of 260,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#191
of 567 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 567 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.