↓ Skip to main content

A Brief Review of Higher Dietary Protein Diets in Weight Loss: A Focus on Athletes

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
259 X users
facebook
43 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
8 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
458 Mendeley
Title
A Brief Review of Higher Dietary Protein Diets in Weight Loss: A Focus on Athletes
Published in
Sports Medicine, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40279-014-0254-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stuart M. Phillips

Abstract

Thermodynamics dictates that for body weight (i.e. stored substrate) loss to occur a person must ingest less energy than they expend. Athletes, who owing to their oftentimes large daily energy expenditures, may have greater flexibility than non-athletes in this regard; however, they may also have different goals for weight loss. In particular, weight lost may be less important to an athlete than from which compartment the weight is lost: fat or lean. A critical question is thus, what balance of macronutrients might promote a greater fat loss, a relative retention of lean mass, and still allow athletic performance to remain uncompromised? It is the central thesis of this review that dietary protein should be a nutrient around which changes in macronutrient composition should be framed. The requirement for protein to sustain lean mass increases while in negative energy balance and protein, as macronutrient, may have advantages with respect to satiety during energy balance, and it may allow greater fat loss during a negative energy balance. However, athletes should be mindful of the fact that increasing dietary protein intake while in negative energy balance would come at the 'expense' of another macronutrient. Most recently there has been interest in lower carbohydrate diets, which may not allow performance to be sustained given the importance of dietary carbohydrate in high-intensity exercise. The relative merits of higher protein diets for athletes are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 259 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 458 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 7 2%
United States 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 435 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 97 21%
Student > Bachelor 94 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 10%
Researcher 29 6%
Other 27 6%
Other 102 22%
Unknown 65 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 124 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 70 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 67 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 4%
Other 50 11%
Unknown 77 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 223. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#175,356
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#163
of 2,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,586
of 275,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#4
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.