↓ Skip to main content

The influence of arctiid moth clicks on bat echolocation; jamming or warning?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology A, November 1985
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
The influence of arctiid moth clicks on bat echolocation; jamming or warning?
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, November 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf00610835
Authors

Annemarie Surlykke, Lee A. Miller

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 85 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 22%
Researcher 17 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Student > Master 7 8%
Other 5 6%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 63%
Environmental Science 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Psychology 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 15 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,047,954
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#423
of 1,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,693
of 10,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them