↓ Skip to main content

Human African trypanosomiasis–neurological aspects

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Human African trypanosomiasis–neurological aspects
Published in
Journal of Neurology, March 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00415-006-0093-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. G. E. Kennedy

Abstract

Human African Trypanosomiasis (HAT),which is also known as sleeping sickness, is a major cause of death and disability in 36 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. The disease is caused by the protozoan parasite of the Trypanosoma genus which is transmitted by the bite of the tsetse fly. The two types of HAT, the East African form due to Trypanosoma b.rhodesiensei (T. b.rhodesiensi) and the West African form due to T. b.gambiense, differ in their tempo of infection but in both cases the disease is always fatal if untreated. As well as multiple systemic features seen in the early (haemolymphatic) stage of disease, the late (encephalitic stage) stage, is associated with a wide range of neurological features including neuropsychiatric, motor and sensory abnormalities. Accurate staging of the disease is absolutely essential because of the potentially fatal complications of melarsoprol treatment of late-stage disease, the most important of which is a severe post-treatment reactive encephalopathy (PTRE) the pathogenesis of which is not fully understood. However, there is not a universal consensus as to how late-stage disease should be diagnosed using CSF criteria, and this has been very problematic in HAT. A more recent alternative drug for late stage gambiense disease is eflornithine (DFMO). There is a pressing need for a non-toxic oral drug for both early and late stage disease that would obviate many of the problems of staging, and various possible strategies to achieve this goal are currently underway. However, control of the disease will also require more effective measures of reducing man/fly contact and also the allocation of much greater financial and infrastructural resources than are currently available in Africa.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 100 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 26%
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 12%
Chemistry 9 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 23 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,447,530
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,764
of 4,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,409
of 66,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.