↓ Skip to main content

Central adiposity after breast cancer diagnosis is related to mortality in the Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle study

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Central adiposity after breast cancer diagnosis is related to mortality in the Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle study
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10549-014-3048-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie M. George, Leslie Bernstein, Ashley W. Smith, Marian L. Neuhouser, Kathy B. Baumgartner, Richard N. Baumgartner, Rachel Ballard-Barbash

Abstract

We examined whether waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) after breast cancer diagnosis are associated with all-cause or breast cancer-specific mortality and explored potential biological pathways mediating these relationships. Our analysis included 621 women diagnosed with local or regional breast cancer who participated in the Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle study. At 30 (±4) months postdiagnosis, trained staff measured participants' waist and hip circumferences and obtained fasting serum samples for biomarker assays for assays of insulin, glucose, C-peptide, insulin growth factor-1 and binding protein-3, C-reactive protein (CRP), and adiponectin. We estimated multivariate hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for death over ~9.5 years of follow-up. After adjustment for measured body mass index, treatment, comorbidities, race/ethnicity, diet quality, and postdiagnosis physical activity, WC was positively associated with all-cause mortality (HRq4:q1: 2.99, 95 % CI 1.14, 7.86) but its positive association with breast cancer-specific mortality was not statistically significant (HRq4:q1: 2.69, 95 % CI 0.69, 12.01). WHR was positively associated with all-cause mortality (HRq4:q1: 2.10, 95 % CI 1.08, 4.05) and breast cancer-specific mortality (HRq4:q1: 4.02, 95 % CI 1.31, 12.31). After adjustment for homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) score and C-reactive protein, risk estimates were attenuated and not statistically significant. In this diverse breast cancer survivor cohort, postdiagnosis WC and WHR were associated with all-cause mortality. Insulin resistance and inflammation may mediate the effects of central adiposity on mortality among breast cancer patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Master 10 11%
Professor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Sports and Recreations 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 30 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2014.
All research outputs
#5,875,103
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#1,288
of 4,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,625
of 228,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#9
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.