↓ Skip to main content

Social Media Use and Mental Health among Young Adults

Overview of attention for article published in Psychiatric Quarterly, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 648)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
285 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1379 Mendeley
Title
Social Media Use and Mental Health among Young Adults
Published in
Psychiatric Quarterly, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11126-017-9535-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chloe Berryman, Christopher J. Ferguson, Charles Negy

Abstract

In recent years many parents, advocates and policy makers have expressed concerns regarding the potential negative impact of social media use. Some studies have indicated that social media use may be tied to negative mental health outcomes, including suicidality, loneliness and decreased empathy. Other studies have not found evidence for harm, or have indicated that social media use may be beneficial for some individuals. The current correlational study examined 467 young adults for their time spent using social media, importance of social media in their lives and tendency to engage in vaguebooking (posting unclear but alarming sounding posts to get attention). Outcomes considered included general mental health symptoms, suicidal ideation, loneliness, social anxiety and decreased empathy. Results indicated that social media use was not predictive of impaired mental health functioning. However, vaguebooking was predictive of suicidal ideation, suggesting this particular behavior could be a warning sign for serious issues. Overall, results from this study suggest that, with the exception of vaguebooking, concerns regarding social media use may be misplaced.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1379 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 284 21%
Student > Master 152 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 5%
Researcher 42 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 3%
Other 155 11%
Unknown 641 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 233 17%
Social Sciences 101 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 81 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 65 5%
Computer Science 41 3%
Other 185 13%
Unknown 673 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 420. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#69,428
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Psychiatric Quarterly
#5
of 648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,482
of 341,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychiatric Quarterly
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them