↓ Skip to main content

Periostin in inflammation and allergy

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Periostin in inflammation and allergy
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00018-017-2648-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenji Izuhara, Satoshi Nunomura, Yasuhiro Nanri, Masahiro Ogawa, Junya Ono, Yasutaka Mitamura, Tomohito Yoshihara

Abstract

We found for the first time that IL-4 and IL-13, signature type 2 cytokines, are able to induce periostin expression. We and others have subsequently shown that periostin is highly expressed in chronic inflammatory diseases-asthma, atopic dermatitis, eosinophilc chronic sinusitis/chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyp, and allergic conjunctivitis-and that periostin plays important roles in the pathogenesis of these diseases. The epithelial/mesenchymal interaction via periostin is important for the onset of allergic inflammation, in which periostin derived from fibroblasts acts on epithelial cells or fibroblasts, activating their NF-κB. Moreover, the immune cell/non-immune cell interaction via periostin may be also involved. Now the significance of periostin has been expanded into other inflammatory or fibrotic diseases such as scleroderma and pulmonary fibrosis. The cross-talk of periostin with TGF-β or pro-inflammatory cytokines is important for the underlying mechanism of these diseases. Because of its pathogenic importance and broad expression, diagnostics or therapeutic drugs can be potentially developed to target periostin as a means of treating these diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 33 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 34 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2017.
All research outputs
#21,141,111
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#3,769
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#277,907
of 317,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#55
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.