| Title |
Organophosphonates utilization by soil strains of Ochrobactrum anthropi and Achromobacter sp.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Microbiology, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00203-017-1343-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Inna T. Ermakova, Tatyana V. Shushkova, Alexey V. Sviridov, Nina F. Zelenkova, Natalya G. Vinokurova, Boris P. Baskunov, Alexey A. Leontievsky |
| Abstract |
Four bacterial strains from glyphosate- or alkylphosphonates-contaminated soils were tested for ability to utilize different organophosphonates. All studied strains readily utilized methylphosphonic acid and a number of other phosphonates, but differed in their ability to degrade glyphosate. Only strains Ochrobactrum anthropi GPK 3 and Achromobacter sp. Kg 16 utilized this compound after isolation from enrichment cultures with glyphosate. Achromobacter sp. MPK 7 from the same enrichment culture, similar to Achromobacter sp. MPS 12 from methylphosphonate-polluted source, required adaptation to growth on GP. Studied strains varied significantly in their growth parameters, efficiency of phosphonates degradation and characteristic products of this process, as well as in their energy metabolism. These differences give grounds to propose a possible model of interaction between these strains in microbial consortium in phosphonate-contaminated soils. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 23% |
| Unknown | 21 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2017.
All research outputs
#20,451,228
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Microbiology
#2,364
of 2,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#356,252
of 420,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Microbiology
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,796 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.