You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Circulating vitamin D concentration and risk of seven cancers: Mendelian randomisation study
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Medical Journal, October 2017
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmj.j4761 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Vasiliki I Dimitrakopoulou, Konstantinos K Tsilidis, Philip C Haycock, Niki L Dimou, Kawthar Al-Dabhani, Richard M Martin, Sarah J Lewis, Marc J Gunter, Alison Mondul, Irene M Shui, Evropi Theodoratou, Katharina Nimptsch, Sara Lindström, Demetrius Albanes, Tilman Kühn, Timothy J Key, Ruth C Travis, Karani Santhanakrishnan Vimaleswaran, the GECCO Consortium, the PRACTICAL Consortium, ELLIPSE DRIVE, Peter Kraft, Brandon L Pierce, Joellen M Schildkraut |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 111 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 20 | 18% |
United States | 13 | 12% |
Spain | 8 | 7% |
Netherlands | 6 | 5% |
Canada | 3 | 3% |
France | 3 | 3% |
Japan | 2 | 2% |
India | 2 | 2% |
Brazil | 2 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 8% |
Unknown | 43 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 71 | 64% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 18% |
Scientists | 18 | 16% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 196 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 27 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 11% |
Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 6% |
Other | 44 | 22% |
Unknown | 58 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 31% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
Chemistry | 4 | 2% |
Other | 19 | 10% |
Unknown | 68 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2022.
All research outputs
#413,835
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#4,942
of 65,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,699
of 343,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#108
of 832 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 832 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.