↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Ligustrazine on Airway Inflammation in A Mouse Model of Neutrophilic Asthma

Overview of attention for article published in Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Effects of Ligustrazine on Airway Inflammation in A Mouse Model of Neutrophilic Asthma
Published in
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11655-017-2830-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiao-ming Liu, Yong-bin Wang, Qian Wu, Zhong-rui Bian, Xiao-wen Che

Abstract

To investigate the effects of ligustrazine (LTZ) on airway inflammation in a mouse model of neutrophilic asthma (NA). Forty healthy C57BL/6 female mice were randomly divided into 4 groups using a random number table, including the normal control, NA, LTZ and dexamethasone (DXM) groups, with 10 rats in each group. The NA mice model was established by the method of ovalbumin combined with lipopolysaccharide sensitization. At 0.5 h before each challenge, LTZ and DXM groups were intraperitoneally injected with LTZ (80 mg/kg) or DXM (0.5 mg/kg) for 14 d, respectively, while the other two groups were given the equal volume of normal saline. After last challenge for 24 h, the aerosol inhalation of methacholine was performed and the airway reactivity was measured. The bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was collected. The Wright-Giemsa staining was used for total white blood cells and differential counts. The levels of cytokines interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-10 were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The pathological change of lung tissue was observed by hematoxylin eosin staining. The airway responsiveness of the NA group was significantly higher than the normal control group (P<0.05), while those in the LTZ and DXM groups were significantly lower than the NA group (P<0.05). The neutrophil and eosinophil counts in the LTZ and DXM groups were significantly lower than the NA group (P<0.05), and those in the LTZ group were significantly lower than the DXM group (P<0.05). There were a large number of peribronchiolar and perivascular inflammatory cells in filtration in the NA group. The airway inflammation in the LTZ and DXM groups were significantly alleviated than the NA group. The infiltration in the LTZ group was significantly reduced than the DXM group. Compared with the normal control group, the IL-17 level in BALF was significantly increased and the IL-10 level in BALF was significantly decreased in the NA group (P<0.05). LTZ and DXM treatment significantly decreased IL-17 levels and increased IL-10 levels compared with the NA group (P<0.05), and the changes in the above indices were more significant in the LTZ group (P<0.05). LTZ could alleviate the airway inflammation in the NA mice model through increasing the IL-10 level and decreasing the IL-17 level.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 27%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2018.
All research outputs
#20,451,228
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine
#535
of 681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,309
of 328,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 681 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.