↓ Skip to main content

Bioinspired Redox‐Active Catechol‐Bearing Polymers as Ultrarobust Organic Cathodes for Lithium Storage

Overview of attention for article published in Advanced Materials, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bioinspired Redox‐Active Catechol‐Bearing Polymers as Ultrarobust Organic Cathodes for Lithium Storage
Published in
Advanced Materials, September 2017
DOI 10.1002/adma.201703373
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nagaraj Patil, Abdelhafid Aqil, Farid Ouhib, Shimelis Admassie, Olle Inganäs, Christine Jérôme, Christophe Detrembleur

Abstract

Redox-active catechols are bioinspired precursors for ortho-quinones that are characterized by higher discharge potentials than para-quinones, the latter being extensively used as organic cathode materials for lithium ion batteries (LIBs). Here, this study demonstrates that the rational molecular design of copolymers bearing catechol- and Li(+) ion-conducting anionic pendants endow redox-active polymers (RAPs) with ultrarobust electrochemical energy storage features when combined to carbon nanotubes as a flexible, binder-, and metal current collector-free buckypaper electrode. The importance of the structure and functionality of the RAPs on the battery performances in LIBs is discussed. The structure-optimized RAPs can store high-capacities of 360 mA h g(-1) at 5C and 320 mA h g(-1) at 30C in LIBs. The high ion and electron mobilities within the buckypaper also enable to register 96 mA h g(-1) (24% capacity retention) at an extreme C-rate of 600C (6 s for total discharge). Moreover, excellent cyclability is noted with a capacity retention of 98% over 3400 cycles at 30C. The high capacity, superior active-material utilization, ultralong cyclability, and excellent rate performances of RAPs-based electrode clearly rival most of the state-of-the-art Li(+) ion organic cathodes, and opens up new horizons for large-scalable fabrication of electrode materials for ultrarobust Li storage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 25%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 28 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 39 35%
Materials Science 19 17%
Engineering 5 5%
Energy 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 39 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2017.
All research outputs
#16,618,724
of 24,451,065 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Materials
#12,241
of 16,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,367
of 319,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Materials
#127
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,451,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.