↓ Skip to main content

Diminished neural responses predict enhanced intrinsic motivation and sensitivity to external incentive

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
Title
Diminished neural responses predict enhanced intrinsic motivation and sensitivity to external incentive
Published in
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, October 2014
DOI 10.3758/s13415-014-0324-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen E. Marsden, Wei Ji Ma, Edward L. Deci, Richard M. Ryan, Pearl H. Chiu

Abstract

The duration and quality of human performance depend on both intrinsic motivation and external incentives. However, little is known about the neuroscientific basis of this interplay between internal and external motivators. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine the neural substrates of intrinsic motivation, operationalized as the free-choice time spent on a task when this was not required, and tested the neural and behavioral effects of external reward on intrinsic motivation. We found that increased duration of free-choice time was predicted by generally diminished neural responses in regions associated with cognitive and affective regulation. By comparison, the possibility of additional reward improved task accuracy, and specifically increased neural and behavioral responses following errors. Those individuals with the smallest neural responses associated with intrinsic motivation exhibited the greatest error-related neural enhancement under the external contingency of possible reward. Together, these data suggest that human performance is guided by a "tonic" and "phasic" relationship between the neural substrates of intrinsic motivation (tonic) and the impact of external incentives (phasic).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 175 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 23%
Student > Master 31 17%
Researcher 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 40 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 64 35%
Neuroscience 18 10%
Social Sciences 16 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 5%
Arts and Humanities 4 2%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 52 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2016.
All research outputs
#8,026,167
of 24,127,822 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#347
of 977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,945
of 264,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,127,822 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.