↓ Skip to main content

Transmuted Expertise: How Technical Non-Experts Can Assess Experts and Expertise

Overview of attention for article published in Argumentation, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Transmuted Expertise: How Technical Non-Experts Can Assess Experts and Expertise
Published in
Argumentation, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10503-011-9217-8
Authors

Harry Collins, Martin Weinel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Morocco 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 63 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 26%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 19 28%
Unknown 2 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 26 38%
Philosophy 11 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 10%
Arts and Humanities 4 6%
Psychology 4 6%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 4 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2016.
All research outputs
#20,941,935
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Argumentation
#253
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,941
of 130,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Argumentation
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.