↓ Skip to main content

De Novo Mutations in Protein Kinase Genes CAMK2A and CAMK2B Cause Intellectual Disability

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Human Genetics, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
139 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
De Novo Mutations in Protein Kinase Genes CAMK2A and CAMK2B Cause Intellectual Disability
Published in
American Journal of Human Genetics, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.10.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sébastien Küry, Geeske M. van Woerden, Thomas Besnard, Martina Proietti Onori, Xénia Latypova, Meghan C. Towne, Megan T. Cho, Trine E. Prescott, Melissa A. Ploeg, Stephan Sanders, Holly A.F. Stessman, Aurora Pujol, Ben Distel, Laurie A. Robak, Jonathan A. Bernstein, Anne-Sophie Denommé-Pichon, Gaëtan Lesca, Elizabeth A. Sellars, Jonathan Berg, Wilfrid Carré, Øyvind Løvold Busk, Bregje W.M. van Bon, Jeff L. Waugh, Matthew Deardorff, George E. Hoganson, Katherine B. Bosanko, Diana S. Johnson, Tabib Dabir, Øystein Lunde Holla, Ajoy Sarkar, Kristian Tveten, Julitta de Bellescize, Geir J. Braathen, Paulien A. Terhal, Dorothy K. Grange, Arie van Haeringen, Christina Lam, Ghayda Mirzaa, Jennifer Burton, Elizabeth J. Bhoj, Jessica Douglas, Avni B. Santani, Addie I. Nesbitt, Katherine L. Helbig, Marisa V. Andrews, Amber Begtrup, Sha Tang, Koen L.I. van Gassen, Jane Juusola, Kimberly Foss, Gregory M. Enns, Ute Moog, Katrin Hinderhofer, Nagarajan Paramasivam, Sharyn Lincoln, Brandon H. Kusako, Pierre Lindenbaum, Eric Charpentier, Catherine B. Nowak, Elouan Cherot, Thomas Simonet, Claudia A.L. Ruivenkamp, Sihoun Hahn, Catherine A. Brownstein, Fan Xia, Sébastien Schmitt, Wallid Deb, Dominique Bonneau, Mathilde Nizon, Delphine Quinquis, Jamel Chelly, Gabrielle Rudolf, Damien Sanlaville, Philippe Parent, Brigitte Gilbert-Dussardier, Annick Toutain, Vernon R. Sutton, Jenny Thies, Lisenka E.L.M. Peart-Vissers, Pierre Boisseau, Marie Vincent, Andreas M. Grabrucker, Christèle Dubourg, Undiagnosed Diseases Network, Wen-Hann Tan, Nienke E. Verbeek, Martin Granzow, Gijs W.E. Santen, Jay Shendure, Bertrand Isidor, Laurent Pasquier, Richard Redon, Yaping Yang, Matthew W. State, Tjitske Kleefstra, Benjamin Cogné, GEM HUGO, Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study, Slavé Petrovski, Kyle Retterer, Evan E. Eichler, Jill A. Rosenfeld, Pankaj B. Agrawal, Stéphane Bézieau, Sylvie Odent, Ype Elgersma, Sandra Mercier

Abstract

Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CAMK2) is one of the first proteins shown to be essential for normal learning and synaptic plasticity in mice, but its requirement for human brain development has not yet been established. Through a multi-center collaborative study based on a whole-exome sequencing approach, we identified 19 exceedingly rare de novo CAMK2A or CAMK2B variants in 24 unrelated individuals with intellectual disability. Variants were assessed for their effect on CAMK2 function and on neuronal migration. For both CAMK2A and CAMK2B, we identified mutations that decreased or increased CAMK2 auto-phosphorylation at Thr286/Thr287. We further found that all mutations affecting auto-phosphorylation also affected neuronal migration, highlighting the importance of tightly regulated CAMK2 auto-phosphorylation in neuronal function and neurodevelopment. Our data establish the importance of CAMK2A and CAMK2B and their auto-phosphorylation in human brain function and expand the phenotypic spectrum of the disorders caused by variants in key players of the glutamatergic signaling pathway.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 191 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 17%
Student > Master 29 15%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Researcher 15 8%
Other 14 7%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 52 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 23%
Neuroscience 25 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 63 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,308,775
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#1,697
of 5,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,512
of 340,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#24
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.