↓ Skip to main content

Amateur Boxing: Physical and Physiological Attributes

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
547 Mendeley
Title
Amateur Boxing: Physical and Physiological Attributes
Published in
Sports Medicine, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40279-014-0274-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helmi Chaabène, Montassar Tabben, Bessem Mkaouer, Emerson Franchini, Yassine Negra, Mehrez Hammami, Samiha Amara, Raja Bouguezzi Chaabène, Younés Hachana

Abstract

Boxing is one of the oldest combat sports. The aim of the current review is to critically analyze the amateur boxer's physical and physiological characteristics and to provide practical recommendations for training as well as new areas of scientific research. High-level male and female boxers show a propensity for low body fat levels. Although studies on boxer somatotypes are limited, the available information shows that elite-level male boxers are characterized by a higher proportion of mesomorphy with a well-developed muscle mass and a low body fat level. To help support the overall metabolic demands of a boxing match and to accelerate the recovery process between rounds, athletes of both sexes require a high level of cardiorespiratory fitness. International boxers show a high peak and mean anaerobic power output. Muscle strength in both the upper and lower limbs is paramount for a fighter's victory and is one of the keys to success in boxing. As boxing punches are brief actions and very dynamic, high-level boxing performance requires well-developed muscle power in both the upper and lower limbs. Albeit limited, the available studies reveal that isometric strength is linked to high-level boxing performance. Future investigations into the physical and physiological attributes of boxers are required to enrich the current data set and to help create a suitable training program.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 547 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 540 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 119 22%
Student > Master 76 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 7%
Student > Postgraduate 35 6%
Researcher 27 5%
Other 95 17%
Unknown 158 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 248 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 3%
Engineering 10 2%
Other 49 9%
Unknown 170 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,052,912
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,723
of 2,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,344
of 260,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#26
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.