↓ Skip to main content

Constructing a perfect matching is in random NC

Overview of attention for article published in Combinatorica, March 1986
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 274)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
183 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Constructing a perfect matching is in random NC
Published in
Combinatorica, March 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf02579407
Authors

R. M. Karp, E. Upfal, A. Wigderson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Professor 4 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 17%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 8 44%
Mathematics 4 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2017.
All research outputs
#5,804,692
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Combinatorica
#48
of 274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,595
of 10,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Combinatorica
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 274 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.