Title |
A las vegas rnc algorithm for maximum matching
|
---|---|
Published in |
Combinatorica, December 1986
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf02579264 |
Authors |
Howard J. Karloff |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 1 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
Researcher | 1 | 20% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 20% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 20% |
Mathematics | 1 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 20% |
Computer Science | 1 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 20% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2017.
All research outputs
#5,804,692
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Combinatorica
#48
of 274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,387
of 45,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Combinatorica
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 274 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them