↓ Skip to main content

Can Antioxidants Protect Against Disuse Muscle Atrophy?

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
Can Antioxidants Protect Against Disuse Muscle Atrophy?
Published in
Sports Medicine, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40279-014-0255-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott K. Powers

Abstract

Long periods of skeletal muscle inactivity (e.g. prolonged bed rest or limb immobilization) results in a loss of muscle protein and fibre atrophy. This disuse-induced muscle atrophy is due to both a decrease in protein synthesis and increased protein breakdown. Although numerous factors contribute to the regulation of the rates of protein breakdown and synthesis in skeletal muscle, it has been established that prolonged muscle inactivity results in increased radical production in the inactive muscle fibres. Further, this increase in radical production plays an important role in the regulation of redox-sensitive signalling pathways that regulate both protein synthesis and proteolysis in skeletal muscle. Indeed, it was suggested over 20 years ago that antioxidant supplementation has the potential to protect skeletal muscles against inactivity-induced fibre atrophy. Since this original proposal, experimental evidence has implied that a few compounds with antioxidant properties are capable of delaying inactivity-induced muscle atrophy. The objective of this review is to discuss the role that radicals play in the regulation of inactivity-induced skeletal muscle atrophy and to provide an analysis of the recent literature indicating that specific antioxidants have the potential to defer disuse muscle atrophy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 141 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 21%
Student > Master 27 18%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Other 7 5%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 29 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 14%
Sports and Recreations 21 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 11%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 32 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,265,510
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,718
of 2,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,421
of 274,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#24
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.