↓ Skip to main content

Atomic connectomics signatures for characterization and differentiation of mild cognitive impairment

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Imaging and Behavior, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Atomic connectomics signatures for characterization and differentiation of mild cognitive impairment
Published in
Brain Imaging and Behavior, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11682-014-9320-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jinli Ou, Li Xie, Xiang Li, Dajiang Zhu, Douglas P. Terry, A. Nicholas Puente, Rongxin Jiang, Yaowu Chen, Lihong Wang, Dinggang Shen, Jing Zhang, L. Stephen Miller, Tianming Liu

Abstract

In recent years, functional connectomics signatures have been shown to be a very valuable tool in characterizing and differentiating brain disorders from normal controls. However, if the functional connectivity alterations in a brain disease are localized within sub-networks of a connectome, then accurate identification of such disease-specific sub-networks is critical and this capability entails both fine-granularity definition of connectome nodes and effective clustering of connectome nodes into disease-specific and non-disease-specific sub-networks. In this work, we adopted the recently developed DICCCOL (dense individualized and common connectivity-based cortical landmarks) system as a fine-granularity high-resolution connectome construction method to deal with the first issue, and employed an effective variant of non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) method to pinpoint disease-specific sub-networks, which we called atomic connectomics signatures in this work. We have implemented and applied this novel framework to two mild cognitive impairment (MCI) datasets from two different research centers, and our experimental results demonstrated that the derived atomic connectomics signatures can effectively characterize and differentiate MCI patients from their normal controls. In general, our work contributed a novel computational framework for deriving descriptive and distinctive atomic connectomics signatures in brain disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 24%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Master 3 9%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 5 15%
Psychology 4 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 13 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2014.
All research outputs
#6,022,567
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#320
of 1,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,014
of 260,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.