↓ Skip to main content

Primary care nurses and Internet information

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nursing Practice, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Primary care nurses and Internet information
Published in
International Journal of Nursing Practice, October 2014
DOI 10.1111/ijn.12361
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean Gilmour, Alison Strong, Helen Chan, Sue Hanna, Annette Huntington

Abstract

Online information is a critical resource for evidence-based practice and patient education. This study aimed to establish New Zealand nurses' access and evaluation of online health information in the primary care context using a postal questionnaire survey; there were 630 respondents from a random sample of 931 nurses. The majority of respondents were satisfied with work access to online information (84.5%, n = 501) and searched for online information at least several times a week (57.5%, n = 343). The major barrier to online information seeking was insufficient time, but 68 respondents had no work online information access. The level of nursing qualification was significantly correlated with computer confidence and information quality checking. A range of information evaluation approaches was used. Most nurses in study accessed and evaluated Internet information in contrast to the findings of earlier studies, but there were barriers preventing universal integration into practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 97 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 19%
Researcher 10 10%
Librarian 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 5 5%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 26 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 23 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 16%
Social Sciences 13 13%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 28 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,380,117
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nursing Practice
#113
of 732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,863
of 265,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nursing Practice
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 732 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.