↓ Skip to main content

Unusually High Levels of n‐6 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Whale Sharks and Reef Manta Rays

Overview of attention for article published in Lipids, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unusually High Levels of n‐6 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Whale Sharks and Reef Manta Rays
Published in
Lipids, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11745-013-3829-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. I. E. Couturier, C. A. Rohner, A. J. Richardson, S. J. Pierce, A. D. Marshall, F. R. A. Jaine, K. A. Townsend, M. B. Bennett, S. J. Weeks, P. D. Nichols

Abstract

Fatty acid (FA) signature analysis has been increasingly used to assess dietary preferences and trophodynamics in marine animals. We investigated FA signatures of connective tissue of the whale shark Rhincodon typus and muscle tissue of the reef manta ray Manta alfredi. We found high levels of n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), dominated by arachidonic acid (20:4n-6; 12-17 % of total FA), and comparatively lower levels of the essential n-3 PUFA-eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5n-3; ~1 %) and docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n-3; 3-10 %). Whale sharks and reef manta rays are regularly observed feeding on surface aggregations of coastal crustacean zooplankton during the day, which generally have FA profiles dominated by n-3 PUFA. The high levels of n-6 PUFA in both giant elasmobranchs raise new questions about the origin of their main food source.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 2%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Mozambique 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 105 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 27%
Researcher 26 23%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Other 4 4%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 20 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 56%
Environmental Science 20 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Philosophy 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 22 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2019.
All research outputs
#14,789,079
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Lipids
#1,525
of 1,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,359
of 199,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lipids
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.