↓ Skip to main content

Chronisch-schleichende Quecksilbervergiftung in der zahn�rztlichen Praxis

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, January 1963
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions
Title
Chronisch-schleichende Quecksilbervergiftung in der zahn�rztlichen Praxis
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, January 1963
DOI 10.1007/bf00581734
Authors

S. Preussner, H. -P. Kl�cking, G. Bast

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2014.
All research outputs
#15,309,583
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#2,001
of 2,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,666
of 8,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 8,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them