↓ Skip to main content

The Facial Autologous Muscular Injection (FAMI) Procedure: An Anatomically Targeted Deep Multiplane Autologous Fat-Grafting Technique Using Principles of Facial Fat Injection

Overview of attention for article published in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
The Facial Autologous Muscular Injection (FAMI) Procedure: An Anatomically Targeted Deep Multiplane Autologous Fat-Grafting Technique Using Principles of Facial Fat Injection
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00266-010-9645-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roger E. Amar, Donald M. Fox

Abstract

As widely described in the medical literature, facial fat grafting has been limited to the subcutaneous plane, with only vague reference to the muscular plane and deeper tissues. Local infiltration, with or without general anesthesia, is commonly used. The challenges of maintaining volumetric correction, symmetry, and predictability have limited practitioners' confidence in obtaining a desirable result when fat grafting the face. The authors describe a technique for facial fat grafting that targets specific anatomic structures and tissue beds, in effect making the patient's underlying anatomy the template for rejuvenation. Engrafting the muscles of facial expression improves graft retention and therefore predictability and symmetry. The ability to target anatomic structures other than muscle lends itself to the prospect of greater therapeutic advances using adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs). A set of principles guiding the technique intended to promote successful cellular engraftment is presented.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 14%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Other 16 31%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 69%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 6 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2015.
All research outputs
#6,274,726
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#210
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,636
of 183,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.