↓ Skip to main content

Dyadic Relationship Values in Chinese Online Daters: Love American Style?

Overview of attention for article published in Sexuality & Culture, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Dyadic Relationship Values in Chinese Online Daters: Love American Style?
Published in
Sexuality & Culture, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12119-014-9255-0
Authors

Rense Lange, James Houran, Song Li

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 26%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 39%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 17%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Unspecified 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 3 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2014.
All research outputs
#15,309,583
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Sexuality & Culture
#409
of 581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,154
of 259,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sexuality & Culture
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.