↓ Skip to main content

A randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trial of a novel cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 fusion protein, Leining, in Chinese active rheumatoid arthritis patients with…

Overview of attention for article published in Rheumatology International, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
A randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trial of a novel cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 fusion protein, Leining, in Chinese active rheumatoid arthritis patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate
Published in
Rheumatology International, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00296-014-2989-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei Fan, Dong-bao Zhao, Shao-Xian Hu, Hu-ji Xu, Xiao Zhang, Miu-jia Zhang, Zhi-wei Chen, Feng-xiao Zhang, Ping Zhu, Xin-fu Li, Li-qi Bi, Bin Zhou, Chun-de Bao

Abstract

To assess the clinical efficacy as well as safety profiles of Leining, a novel cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 fusion protein, versus placebo in the treatment of Chinese active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with an inadequate clinical response to methotrexate (MTX). In this 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study, a total of 440 Chinese patients with active RA with an inadequate response to MTX were randomly assigned to receive Leining (10 mg/kg) or placebo. Clinical response was assessed using the American College of Rheumatology 20 % improvement criteria ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70, with ACR20 as the primary major endpoints. Disease activity scores in 28 joints with erythrocyte sedimentation rate assessment (DAS28-ESR) were used to evaluate disease activity. After 24 weeks of treatment, significantly more patients in Leining group achieved ACR20 response than those in placebo group (70.61 vs. 46.36 %; p < 0.001). Similarly, ACR50 and ACR70 responses of Leining group were significantly higher than those of placebo group (40.30 vs. 22.73 %; p < 0.001 and 16.67 vs. 7.27 %; p < 0.05, respectively). DAS28-ESR in Leining group was significantly reduced compared to that in placebo group, with greater clinically meaningful (>1.2 unit) improvement (54.85 vs. 29.09 %, p < 0.05). Both the rates of remission (DAS28-ESR < 2.6) and low disease activity (DAS28-ESR < 3.2) were greater in the Leining group than those in the placebo group (12.42 vs. 2.73 %; p < 0.05 and 15.45 vs. 2.73 %; p < 0.05 respectively). The overall incidence of adverse events was similar in both Leining and placebo groups. No neutralizing antibodies were detected. Leining demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy compared with placebo in Chinese patients with active RA despite MTX therapy. Administration of Leining in combination with MTX for 24 weeks was well tolerated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Other 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2014.
All research outputs
#20,242,136
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Rheumatology International
#1,968
of 2,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,128
of 224,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheumatology International
#34
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.