| Title |
Standardized residency training in China: the new internal medicine curriculum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40037-017-0378-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan Lio, Yanqing Ye, Hongmei Dong, Shalini Reddy, John McConville, Renslow Sherer |
| Abstract |
China formally established a system of national standardized medical residency training in 2014, which affects the health of its 1.4 billion people. Accompanying this system were new guidelines and standards for internal medicine residency training. However, the majority of the standards focused on process measurements, such as minimum case requirements of diseases and procedural skills, rather than describing broader physician competencies in the domains of professionalism, patient care, communication, teamwork, quality improvement, and scholarship. While China has taken a large step forward with standardization of certain aspects of internal medicine residency training, the next step should focus on outcome measures and creating a system that is competency-based. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 23% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2017.
All research outputs
#22,876,107
of 25,508,813 outputs
Outputs from Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs
#554
of 574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,756
of 341,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs
#15
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,508,813 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.