↓ Skip to main content

Interactive cervical motion kinematics: Sensitivity, specificity and clinically significant values for identifying kinematic impairments in patients with chronic neck pain

Overview of attention for article published in Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interactive cervical motion kinematics: Sensitivity, specificity and clinically significant values for identifying kinematic impairments in patients with chronic neck pain
Published in
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, October 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.math.2014.10.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hilla Sarig Bahat, Xiaoqi Chen, David Reznik, Einat Kodesh, Julia Treleaven

Abstract

Chronic neck pain has been consistently shown to be associated with impaired kinematic control including reduced range, velocity and smoothness of cervical motion, that seem relevant to daily function as in quick neck motion in response to surrounding stimuli. The objectives of this study were: to compare interactive cervical kinematics in patients with neck pain and controls; to explore the new measures of cervical motion accuracy; and to find the sensitivity, specificity, and optimal cutoff values for defining impaired kinematics in those with neck pain. In this cross-section study, 33 patients with chronic neck pain and 22 asymptomatic controls were assessed for their cervical kinematic control using interactive virtual reality hardware and customized software utilizing a head mounted display with built-in head tracking. Outcome measures included peak and mean velocity, smoothness (represented by number of velocity peaks (NVP)), symmetry (represented by time to peak velocity percentage (TTPP)), and accuracy of cervical motion. Results demonstrated significant and strong effect-size differences in peak and mean velocities, NVP and TTPP in all directions excluding TTPP in left rotation, and good effect-size group differences in 5/8 accuracy measures. Regression results emphasized the high clinical value of neck motion velocity, with very high sensitivity and specificity (85%-100%), followed by motion smoothness, symmetry and accuracy. These finding suggest cervical kinematics should be evaluated clinically, and screened by the provided cut off values for identification of relevant impairments in those with neck pain. Such identification of presence or absence of kinematic impairments may direct treatment strategies and additional evaluation when needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 197 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 19%
Student > Bachelor 28 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Researcher 11 5%
Other 44 22%
Unknown 42 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 20%
Engineering 13 6%
Sports and Recreations 9 4%
Computer Science 7 3%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 46 23%