| Title |
Hydraulic redistribution in three Amazonian trees
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, August 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-005-0108-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rafael S. Oliveira, Todd E. Dawson, Stephen S. O. Burgess, Daniel C. Nepstad |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 482 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 20 | 4% |
| United States | 7 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Panama | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 446 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 99 | 21% |
| Researcher | 86 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 76 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 32 | 7% |
| Professor | 29 | 6% |
| Other | 106 | 22% |
| Unknown | 54 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 198 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 124 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 53 | 11% |
| Engineering | 16 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 18 | 4% |
| Unknown | 70 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2019.
All research outputs
#4,507,105
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#884
of 5,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,393
of 70,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.