↓ Skip to main content

Multiple sclerosis-induced neuropathic pain: pharmacological management and pathophysiological insights from rodent EAE models

Overview of attention for article published in Inflammopharmacology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
Title
Multiple sclerosis-induced neuropathic pain: pharmacological management and pathophysiological insights from rodent EAE models
Published in
Inflammopharmacology, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10787-013-0195-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nemat Khan, Maree T. Smith

Abstract

In patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), pain is a frequent and disabling symptom. The prevalence is in the range 29-86 % depending upon the assessment protocols utilised and the definition of pain applied. Neuropathic pain that develops secondary to demyelination, neuroinflammation and axonal damage in the central nervous system is the most distressing and difficult type of pain to treat. Although dysaesthetic extremity pain, L'hermitte's sign and trigeminal neuralgia are the most common neuropathic pain conditions reported by patients with MS, research directed at gaining insight into the complex mechanisms underpinning the pathobiology of MS-associated neuropathic pain is in its relative infancy. By contrast, there is a wealth of knowledge on the neurobiology of neuropathic pain induced by peripheral nerve injury. To date, the majority of research in the MS field has used rodent models of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) as these models have many clinical and neuropathological features in common with those observed in patients with MS. However, it is only relatively recently that EAE-rodents have been utilised to investigate the mechanisms contributing to the development and maintenance of MS-associated central neuropathic pain. Importantly, EAE-rodent models exhibit pro-nociceptive behaviours predominantly in the lower extremities (tail and hindlimbs) as seen clinically in patients with MS-neuropathic pain. Herein, we review research to date on the pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning MS-associated neuropathic pain as well as the pharmacological management of this condition. We also identify knowledge gaps to guide future research in this important field.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 177 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 15%
Researcher 26 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Other 12 7%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 42 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 23%
Neuroscience 36 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 45 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2015.
All research outputs
#7,203,348
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Inflammopharmacology
#168
of 531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,281
of 212,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammopharmacology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.