| Title |
Sugar-sweetened beverage intake associations with fasting glucose and insulin concentrations are not modified by selected genetic variants in a ChREBP-FGF21 pathway: a meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diabetologia, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00125-017-4475-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicola M. McKeown, Hassan S. Dashti, Jiantao Ma, Danielle E. Haslam, Jessica C. Kiefte-de Jong, Caren E. Smith, Toshiko Tanaka, Mariaelisa Graff, Rozenn N. Lemaitre, Denis Rybin, Emily Sonestedt, Alexis C. Frazier-Wood, Dennis O. Mook-Kanamori, Yanping Li, Carol A. Wang, Elisabeth T. M. Leermakers, Vera Mikkilä, Kristin L. Young, Kenneth J. Mukamal, L. Adrienne Cupples, Christina-Alexandra Schulz, Tzu-An Chen, Ruifang Li-Gao, Tao Huang, Wendy H. Oddy, Olli Raitakari, Kenneth Rice, James B. Meigs, Ulrika Ericson, Lyn M. Steffen, Frits R. Rosendaal, Albert Hofman, Mika Kähönen, Bruce M. Psaty, Louise Brunkwall, Andre G. Uitterlinden, Jorma Viikari, David S. Siscovick, Ilkka Seppälä, Kari E. North, Dariush Mozaffarian, Josée Dupuis, Marju Orho-Melander, Stephen S. Rich, Renée de Mutsert, Lu Qi, Craig E. Pennell, Oscar H. Franco, Terho Lehtimäki, Mark A. Herman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 102 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 11 | 11% |
| Australia | 4 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 3% |
| Denmark | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 39 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 59 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 22% |
| Scientists | 19 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 127 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 21% |
| Unknown | 41 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 9% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 50 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2019.
All research outputs
#722,424
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#359
of 5,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,142
of 345,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#9
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.